ArticleEye (London, England)2022
Hypercoagulability in patients with indirect carotid cavernous fistulas.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous Resolution of a Bilateral Barrow Type D Indirect Carotid-Cavernous Fistula: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Severe papilledema and multiple hypercoagulability abnormalities in patient with dural arterio-venous fistulas.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Article
- The Development of Indirect Carotid Cavernous Fistulas after Microvascular Ischemic 4th Nerve Palsies.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess patients with indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCF) for evidence of hypercoagulable state (HS) by combination of comprehensive medical questionnaire and laboratory testing.
methodsPatients with confirmed diagnosis of CCF treated between 2003 and 2019 were included and administered a questionnaire screening for HS risk factors and undergone laboratory investigations which included complete blood count (CBC), prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), fibrinogen, antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibody titres), Factor V Leiden, prothrombin, protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, homocysteine, prothrombin G20210, CALR and JAK2 mutation screening. Participants with abnormal laboratory testing and/or past history of ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation, cancer or hypercoagulability-associated hereditary disorders were deemed to have HS.
resultsTwenty-two patients were enrolled. Seventeen were women and the mean age at diagnosis was 60. Fourteen (64%) had evidence of HS: six on medical history, three with laboratory evidence and five with both. Eight (36%) had current abnormal hypercoagulability markers. One had a diagnosis of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome, but no others had evidence of hereditary thrombophilia. Nine were on anti-coagulation initiated after diagnosis of stroke or atrial fibrillation discovered on average 5.5 years after the diagnosis of CCF.
conclusionA total of 64% percent of patients with previous indirect CCF had evidence of underlying HS indicating that hypercoagulability might play a role in the pathogenesis of CCF. The results support need for comprehensive testing for underlying HS in patients with indirect CCFs to better identify, manage, and prevent further thromboembolic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.