Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635793›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Kleptoplast distribution, photosynthetic efficiency and sequestration mechanisms in intertidal benthic foraminifera.

Bruno Jesus, Thierry Jauffrais, Erik C L Trampe, Johannes W Goessling, Charlotte Lekieffre, Anders Meibom, Michael Kühl, Emmanuelle Geslin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Bruno Jesus *EA2160, Laboratoire Mer Molécules Santé, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France. bruno.jesus@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2047-3783
Thierry Jauffrais *Ifremer, IRD, Univ Nouvelle-Calédonie, Univ La Réunion, CNRS, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE, 101 Promenade Roger Laroque, 98897, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Erik C L TrampeMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, 3000, Helsingør, DK, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3249-0297
Johannes W GoesslingMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, 3000, Helsingør, DK, Denmark.
Charlotte LekieffreCell and Plant Physiology Laboratory, University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, INRAE, Grenoble, France.
Anders MeibomLaboratory for Biological Geochemistry, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-2819
Michael KühlMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, 3000, Helsingør, DK, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-4790
Emmanuelle GeslinLPG UMR 6112, Univ Angers, Université de Nantes, CNRS, F-49000, Angers, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraminifera are ubiquitously distributed in marine habitats, playing a major role in marine sediment carbon sequestration and the nitrogen cycle. They exhibit a wide diversity of feeding and behavioural strategies (heterotrophy, autotrophy and mixotrophy), including species with the ability of sequestering intact functional chloroplasts from their microalgal food source (kleptoplastidy), resulting in a mixotrophic lifestyle. The mechanisms by which kleptoplasts are integrated and kept functional inside foraminiferal cytosol are poorly known. In our study, we investigated relationships between feeding strategies, kleptoplast spatial distribution and photosynthetic functionality in two shallow-water benthic foraminifera (Haynesina germanica and Elphidium williamsoni), both species feeding on benthic diatoms. We used a combination of observations of foraminiferal feeding behaviour, test morphology, cytological TEM-based observations and HPLC pigment analysis, with non-destructive, single-cell level imaging of kleptoplast spatial distribution and PSII quantum efficiency. The two species showed different feeding strategies, with H. germanica removing diatom content at the foraminifer's apertural region and E. williamsoni on the dorsal site. All E. williamsoni parameters showed that this species has higher autotrophic capacity albeit both feeding on benthic diatoms. This might represent two different stages in the evolutionary process of establishing a permanent symbiotic relationship, or may reflect different trophic strategies.

Indexed as

DiatomsForaminiferaEnvironmental MonitoringGeologic SedimentsHeterotrophic ProcessesPhotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID34635793
PMCPMC8857221
OpenAlexW3207324245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.