Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A proof of concept study for the differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, hCoV-NL63, and IAV-H1N1 in vitro cultures using ion mobility spectrometry.

M Feuerherd, A-K Sippel, J Erber, J I Baumbach, R M Schmid, U Protzer, F Voit, C D Spinner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M FeuerherdInstitute of Virology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany. martin.feuerherd@tum.de.
A-K SippelB. Braun Melsungen AG, Branch Dortmund, Center of Competence Breath Analysis, BioMedicalCenter, Dortmund, Germany.
J ErberDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
J I BaumbachB. Braun Melsungen AG, Branch Dortmund, Center of Competence Breath Analysis, BioMedicalCenter, Dortmund, Germany.
R M SchmidDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
U ProtzerInstitute of Virology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
F Voit *Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
C D Spinner *Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEB. Braun (Germany) · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, high-throughput diagnostic tests are essential to decelerate the spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While RT-PCR tests performed in centralized laboratories remain the gold standard, rapid point-of-care antigen tests might provide faster results. However, they are associated with markedly reduced sensitivity. Bedside breath gas analysis of volatile organic compounds detected by ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) may enable a quick and sensitive point-of-care testing alternative. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated whether gas analysis by IMS can discriminate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from other respiratory viruses in an experimental set-up. Repeated gas analyses of air samples collected from the headspace of virus-infected in vitro cultures were performed for 5 days. A three-step decision tree using the intensities of four spectrometry peaks correlating to unidentified volatile organic compounds allowed the correct classification of SARS-CoV-2, human coronavirus-NL63, and influenza A virus H1N1 without misassignment when the calculation was performed with data 3 days post infection. The forward selection assignment model allowed the identification of SARS-CoV-2 with high sensitivity and specificity, with only one of 231 measurements (0.43%) being misclassified. Thus, volatile organic compound analysis by IMS allows highly accurate differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 from other respiratory viruses in an experimental set-up, supporting further research and evaluation in clinical studies.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAnimalsAntigens, ViralChlorocebus aethiopsCoronavirus NL63, HumanCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingDiagnosis, DifferentialHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeIon Mobility SpectrometryProof of Concept StudySARS-CoV-2Vero CellsAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID34635788
PMCPMC8505652
OpenAlexW3207275425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.