Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635785›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2022

Effects of age on survival and neurological recovery of individuals following acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Julio C Furlan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julio C FurlanLyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. jcfurlan@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of older age at the time of injury on the individuals' survival and neurological recovery within the first year after acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI).

settingUnited States.

methodsThis study included all participants enrolled into the First National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS-1). Outcome measures included survival and neurological recovery (as assessed using the NASCIS motor and sensory scores) within the first year after tSCI. Data analyses of neurological recovery were adjusted for major potential confounders.

resultsThe study included 39 females and 267 males with overall mean age of 31 years who mostly sustained cervical severe tSCI after motor vehicle accidents or falls. Survival rates among older individuals are significantly lower than among younger individuals within the first year following tSCI (p < 0.0001). Among who survived the first year of tSCI, there were no statistically significant difference between older survivors and younger survivors regarding motor and sensory recovery in the multiple regression analyses adjusted for major potential confounders.

conclusionsThe results of this retrospective study suggest that older age at the injury onset is associated with lower survival rate within the first year following tSCI. However, older individuals have similar potential to recover from their initial neurological impairment to younger individuals after tSCI. The results of this study combined to the recent literature underline the need for multidisciplinary team approach to the management of the elderly with acute SCI is essential to maximize their recovery.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRecovery of FunctionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34635785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.