Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635671›Full record

ArticleNPJ schizophrenia2021

You read my mind: fMRI markers of threatening appraisals in people with persistent psychotic experiences.

Raphael Underwood, Liam Mason, Owen O'Daly, Jeffrey Dalton, Andrew Simmons, Gareth J Barker, Emmanuelle Peters, Veena Kumari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ schizophrenia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael UnderwoodKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, London, UK. raphael.underwood@slam.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-6476
Liam MasonUniversity College London, Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, UK.
Owen O'DalyKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Neuroimaging, London, UK.
Jeffrey DaltonKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Neuroimaging, London, UK.
Andrew SimmonsKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Neuroimaging, London, UK.
Gareth J BarkerKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Neuroimaging, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-7421
Emmanuelle PetersKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, London, UK.
Veena KumariKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-5505
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomalous perceptual experiences are relatively common in the general population. Evidence indicates that the key to distinguishing individuals with persistent psychotic experiences (PEs) with a need for care from those without is how they appraise their anomalous experiences. Here, we aimed to characterise the neural circuits underlying threatening and non-threatening appraisals in people with and without a need for care for PEs, respectively. A total of 48 participants, consisting of patients with psychosis spectrum disorder (clinical group, n = 16), non-need-for-care participants with PEs (non-clinical group, n = 16), and no-PE healthy control participants (n = 16), underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while completing the Telepath task, designed to induce an anomalous perceptual experience. Appraisals of the anomalous perceptual experiences were examined, as well as functional brain responses during this window, for significant group differences. We also examined whether activation co-varied with the subjective threat appraisals reported in-task by participants. The clinical group reported elevated subjective threat appraisals compared to both the non-clinical and no-PE control groups, with no differences between the two non-clinical groups. This pattern of results was accompanied by reduced activation in the superior and inferior frontal gyri in the clinical group as compared to the non-clinical and control groups. Precuneus activation scaled with threat appraisals reported in-task. Resilience in the context of persistent anomalous experiences may be explained by intact functioning of fronto-parietal regions, and may correspond to the ability to contextualise and flexibly evaluate psychotic experiences.

Identifiers

PMID34635671
PMCPMC8505497
OpenAlexW3205388164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.