Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635510›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Quality of life in elderly ICU survivors before the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Kevin Ariyo, Sergio Canestrini, Anthony S David, Alex Ruck Keene, Sebastian Wolfrum, Gareth Owen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of age on intensive care.Ageing research reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin AriyoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK kevin.ariyo@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-2502
Sergio CanestriniCritical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anthony S DavidInstitute of Mental Health, UCL, London, UK.
Alex Ruck KeeneDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Sebastian WolfrumMedical Clinic II, Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Gareth OwenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203376/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe influence of age on intensive care unit (ICU) decision-making is complex, and it is unclear if it is based on expected subjective or objective patient outcomes. To address recent concerns over age-based ICU decision-making, we explored patient-assessed quality of life (QoL) in ICU survivors before the COVID-19 pandemic.

designA systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies published between January 2000 and April 2020, of elderly patients admitted to ICUs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We extracted data on self-reported QoL (EQ-5D composite score), demographic and clinical variables. Using a random-effect meta-analysis, we then compared QoL scores at follow-up to scores either before admission, age-matched population controls or younger ICU survivors. We conducted sensitivity analyses to study heterogeneity and bias and a qualitative synthesis of subscores.

resultsWe identified 2536 studies and included 22 for qualitative synthesis and 18 for meta-analysis (n=2326 elderly survivors). Elderly survivors' QoL was significantly worse than younger ICU survivors, with a small-to-medium effect size (d=0.35 (-0.53 and -0.16)). Elderly survivors' QoL was also significantly greater when measured slightly before ICU, compared with follow-up, with a small effect size (d=0.26 (-0.44 and -0.08)). Finally, their QoL was also marginally significantly worse than age-matched community controls, also with a small effect size (d=0.21 (-0.43 and 0.00)). Mortality rates and length of follow-up partly explained heterogeneity. Reductions in QoL seemed primarily due to physical health, rather than mental health items.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the proportionality of age as a determinant of ICU resource allocation should be kept under close review and that subjective QoL outcomes should inform person-centred decision -aking in elderly ICU patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020181181.

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality of LifeAgedCohort StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SurvivorsCOVID-19ethics (see medical ethics)intensive & critical carerationingstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34635510
PMCPMC8506050
OpenAlexW3206986325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.