Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635312›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of cardiology2021

Effect of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score on the Triage Performance in Patients With Chest Pain.

Arian Zaboli, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Serena Sibilio, Elia Toccolini, Antonio Bonora, Alberto Giudiceandrea, Eleonora Rella, Rupert Paulmichl, Norbert Pfeifer, Gianni Turcato

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05175144 (Diagnostic Performance of "Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score" in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05175144 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Performance of "Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score" in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled146ConditionsAcute Chest Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arian ZaboliEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy. Electronic address: zaboliarian@gmail.com.
Dietmar AusserhoferCollege of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano, Italy; Department of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Serena SibilioEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Elia ToccoliniEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Antonio BonoraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Civile Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alberto GiudiceandreaEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Eleonora RellaEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Rupert PaulmichlDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Norbert PfeiferEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Gianni TurcatoEmergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano, Italy.
Krankenhaus Meran · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensitivity of triage systems in identifying acute cardiovascular events in patients presented to the emergency department with chest pain is not optimal. Recently, a clinical score, the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), has been proposed for a rapid assessment without additional instruments. To evaluate whether the integration of EDACS into triage evaluation of patients with chest pain can improve the triage's predictive validity for an acute cardiovascular event, a single-center prospective observational study was conducted. This study involved all patients who needed a triage admission for chest pain between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. All enrolled patients first underwent a standard triage assessment and then the EDACS was calculated. The primary outcome of the study was the presence of an acute cardiovascular event. The discriminatory ability of EDACS in triage compared with standard triage assessment was evaluated by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve analysis, and net reclassification improvement. The study involved 1,596 patients, of that 7.3% presented the study outcome. The discriminatory ability of triage presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.688 that increased to 0.818 after the application of EDACS in the triage assessment. EDACS improved the baseline assessment of priority assigned in triage, with a net reclassification improvement of 33.6% (p <0.001), and the decision curve analyses demonstrated that EDACS in triage resulted in a clear net clinical benefit. In conclusion, the results of the study suggest that EDACS has a good discriminatory capacity for acute cardiovascular events and that its implementation in routine triage may improve triage performance in patients with chest pain.

Indexed as

Chest PainElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveTriage

Identifiers

PMID34635312
PMCPMC9336201
OpenAlexW3206472007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.