Observational studyThe American journal of cardiology2021
Effect of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score on the Triage Performance in Patients With Chest Pain.
Observational study in The American journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05175144 (Diagnostic Performance of "Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score" in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Performance of "Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score" in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal Trends and Clinical Implications of Cardiac Troponin Testing in Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of optimizing the triage process for cardiac patients presenting to the cardiac emergency department on quality of care indicators: a quasi-experimental study in Southern Iran.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- External validation of the SCARE score in identifying acute coronary syndromes during medical regulation of chest pain.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and evaluation of a triage assessment model for patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain: mixed retrospective and prospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Implementation of Revised Simplified Geneva Score in Triage Nurse Evaluation for Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Chart Review.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for assessing comorbidity and frailty in triage: a multicentre observational study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Assessment and Application of the Hear Score in Remote Emergency Medicine Outposts in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- The Diagnostic Evaluation of the SINEH Cardiopulmonary Triage Scale and the Emergency Severity Index in the Emergency Department: A Comparative Study.Emergency medicine international · 2024Article
- Improving the performance of a triage scale for chest pain patients admitted to emergency departments: combining cardiovascular risk factors and electrocardiogram.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sensitivity of triage systems in identifying acute cardiovascular events in patients presented to the emergency department with chest pain is not optimal. Recently, a clinical score, the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), has been proposed for a rapid assessment without additional instruments. To evaluate whether the integration of EDACS into triage evaluation of patients with chest pain can improve the triage's predictive validity for an acute cardiovascular event, a single-center prospective observational study was conducted. This study involved all patients who needed a triage admission for chest pain between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. All enrolled patients first underwent a standard triage assessment and then the EDACS was calculated. The primary outcome of the study was the presence of an acute cardiovascular event. The discriminatory ability of EDACS in triage compared with standard triage assessment was evaluated by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve analysis, and net reclassification improvement. The study involved 1,596 patients, of that 7.3% presented the study outcome. The discriminatory ability of triage presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.688 that increased to 0.818 after the application of EDACS in the triage assessment. EDACS improved the baseline assessment of priority assigned in triage, with a net reclassification improvement of 33.6% (p <0.001), and the decision curve analyses demonstrated that EDACS in triage resulted in a clear net clinical benefit. In conclusion, the results of the study suggest that EDACS has a good discriminatory capacity for acute cardiovascular events and that its implementation in routine triage may improve triage performance in patients with chest pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.