Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635158›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2021

Individual and collective human intelligence in drug design: evaluating the search strategy.

Giovanni Cincilla, Simone Masoni, Jascha Blobel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giovanni CincillaMolomics, Barcelona Science Park, c/Baldiri i Reixac 4-12, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. gcincilla@molomics.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-0707
Simone MasoniMolomics, Barcelona Science Park, c/Baldiri i Reixac 4-12, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. smasoni@molomics.com.
Jascha BlobelMolomics, Barcelona Science Park, c/Baldiri i Reixac 4-12, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. jblobel@molomics.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, individual and collective human intelligence, defined as the knowledge, skills, reasoning and intuition of individuals and groups, have been used in combination with computer algorithms to solve complex scientific problems. Such approach was successfully used in different research fields such as: structural biology, comparative genomics, macromolecular crystallography and RNA design. Herein we describe an attempt to use a similar approach in small-molecule drug discovery, specifically to drive search strategies of de novo drug design. This is assessed with a case study that consists of a series of public experiments in which participants had to explore the huge chemical space in silico to find predefined compounds by designing molecules and analyzing the score associate with them. Such a process may be seen as an instantaneous surrogate of the classical design-make-test cycles carried out by medicinal chemists during the drug discovery hit to lead phase but not hindered by long synthesis and testing times. We present first findings on (1) assessing human intelligence in chemical space exploration, (2) comparing individual and collective human intelligence performance in this task and (3) contrasting some human and artificial intelligence achievements in de novo drug design.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChemical space explorationCollective intelligenceDe novo drug design

Identifiers

PMID34635158
PMCPMC8507178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.