Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34634920›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Prognostic Value of Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Patients With Asymmetric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Milorad Tesic, Branko Beleslin, Vojislav Giga, Ivana Jovanovic, Jelena Marinkovic, Danijela Trifunovic, Olga Petrovic, Milan Dobric, Srdjan Aleksandric, Stefan Juricic and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Milorad TesicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3758-3719
Branko BeleslinClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Vojislav GigaClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Ivana JovanovicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8036-6560
Jelena MarinkovicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics School of Medicine University of Belgrade.
Danijela TrifunovicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Olga PetrovicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Milan DobricClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-0451
Srdjan AleksandricClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6903-4477
Stefan JuricicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3045-5263
Nikola BoskovicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Miloje TomasevicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9514-3674
Arsen RisticClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Dejan OrlicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Sinisa StojkovicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Vladan VukcevicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
Goran StankovicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-0885
Miodrag OstojicSchool of Medicine University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia.
Ana Djordjevic DikicClinic for CardiologyClinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSCentar za Promociju Nauke · RSSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts · RSCenter for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences · RSUniversity of Kragujevac · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Microvascular dysfunction might be a major determinant of clinical deterioration and outcome in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, long-term prognostic value of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TDE) coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) on clinical outcome is uncertain in HCM patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess long-term prognostic value of CFVR on clinical outcome in HCM population. Methods and Results We prospectively included 150 HCM patients (82 women; mean age 48±15 years). Patients' clinical characteristics, echocardiographic and CFVR findings (both for left anterior descending [LAD] and posterior descending artery [PD]), were assessed in all patients. The primary outcome was a composite of: HCM related death, heart failure requiring hospitalization, sustained ventricular tachycardia and ischemic stroke. Patients were stratified into 2 subgroups depending on CFVR LAD value: Group 1 (CFVR LAD>2, [n=87]) and Group 2 (CFVR LAD≤2, [n=63]). During a median follow-up of 88 months, 41/150 (27.3%) patients had adverse cardiac events. In Group 1, there were 8/87 (9.2%), whereas in Group 2 there were 33/63 (52.4%,

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicEchocardiography, DopplerAdultBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisadverse cardiac outcomecoronary flow velocity reservehypertrophic cardiomyopathymicrovascular dysfunctionprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34634920
PMCPMC8751885
OpenAlexW3206409918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.