Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34634634›Full record

ArticleESMO open2021

Serologic response to COVID-19 infection and/or vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment.

A Grinshpun, Y Rottenberg, I Z Ben-Dov, E Djian, D G Wolf, L Kadouri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A GrinshpunSharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Y RottenbergSharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
I Z Ben-DovFaculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
E DjianFaculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; Clinical Virology Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
D G WolfFaculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; Clinical Virology Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
L KadouriSharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: luna@hadassah.org.il.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt was shown that immunocompromised patients have significantly reduced immunologic responses to COVID-19 vaccines. The immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine/infection in patients with solid tumors is reduced. We evaluated the immunologic response to COVID-19 and/or the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among cancer patients on active treatments and reviewed previous literature to identify subgroups that may require third vaccination. PATIENTS AND

methodsAnti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies were measured in a cohort of 202 cancer patients on active treatment with chemotherapy (96), immunologic (52), biologic (46), and hormonal (12) treatments for early (n = 66, 32.7%) or metastatic disease (n = 136, 67.3%). Of those, 172 had received two vaccine doses, and 30 had COVID-19 infection (20/30 also received one dose of vaccine). Specific anti-S receptor-binding domain antibodies were further measured in patients with equivocal anti-S1/S2 results.

resultsAmong cancer patients, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response rate was 89.1% (180/202) after COVID-19 vaccination or infection and 87.2% (150/172) in patients after vaccination without a history of COVID-19, compared with 100% positive serologic tests in a control group of 30 health care workers (P < 0.001). Chemotherapy treatment was independently associated with significantly reduced humoral response to infection or vaccination, with an 81.3% response rate, compared with 96.2% in patients on other treatments (P = 0.001). In vaccinated patients on chemotherapy, the positive response rate was 77.5%. In a multiple regression model, a neutralizing antibody titer (>60 AU/ml) was more likely with immunotherapy (odds ratio 2.44) and less likely with chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.39).

conclusionsOverall, both COVID-19 vaccine and natural infection are highly immunogenic among cancer patients. Our study, however, identifies those under chemotherapy as significantly less responsive, and with lower antibody levels. These findings justify close virological and serological surveillance along with consideration of these patients for booster (third dose) vaccine prioritization, as new highly spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsVaccinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinescancerchemotherapyCOVID-19serologic responsesolid tumorsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID34634634
PMCPMC8469519
OpenAlexW3204258336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.