Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34634207›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Willingness to Accept Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and its Influencing Factors Using Information-Motivation-Behavior Skills Model: A Cross-Sectional Study of Female College Freshmen in Mainland China.

Mingyu Si, Yu Jiang, Xiaoyou Su, Wenjun Wang, Xi Zhang, Xiaofen Gu, Li Ma, Jing Li, Shaokai Zhang, Zefang Ren and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Mingyu SiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Medicine and Public Health, 12501Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-9301
Yu JiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Medicine and Public Health, 12501Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyou SuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Medicine and Public Health, 12501Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wenjun WangSchool of Nursing, 74496Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China.
Xi ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, 12519Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-6981
Xiaofen GuAffiliated Tumor Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Li MaPublic Health School, 36674Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jing LiWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University/West China Forth Hospital, 12530Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shaokai Zhang377327Henan Cancer Hospital, Affiliate Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zefang RenSchool of Public Health, 26469Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanli LiuSchool of Health Policy and Management, 12501Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Youlin QiaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Medicine and Public Health, 12501Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNDalian Medical University · CNJining Medical University · CNPeking University · CNSichuan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the awareness and attitudes toward human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among female college freshmen and explore their willingness and associated factors to receive the HPV vaccine based on the information-motivation-behavior skills (IMB) model.

methodsFrom February 21 to April 30, 2020, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among female freshmen in seven colleges in mainland China. Socio-demographic characteristics, health-related awareness, knowledge of HPV, motivation, and behavioral skills toward HPV vaccination were assessed using questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the influencing factors of willingness to receive the HPV vaccine in the next 6 months.

resultsAmong the 3867 students invited to participate in this study, 102 (2.64%) reported having taken the HPV vaccine. Among the unvaccinated participants, 59.89% had previously heard of HPV, and 32.08% were willing to take the HPV vaccine in the next 6 months. Willingness to get the HPV vaccine was associated with sexual experience(s) (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.25-3.08), family or friends with cancer (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04-1.48), having heard of HPV (AOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.47), and having actively searched for or having consulted on issues concerning HPV vaccine (AOR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.45). In the dimensions of the IMB model, "perceived susceptibility" (AOR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09-1.31), "perceived severity" (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11-1.39), "subjective norms" (AOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.75-2.49), and "self-efficacy" (AOR: 2.95, 95% CI: 2.44-3.58) were positively associated with HPV vaccination acceptance, while "perceived barriers" (AOR = .60, 95% CI: .52-.69) negatively affected intention to get HPV vaccination.

conclusionHPV vaccination rates and willingness to receive the HPV vaccine in the next 6 months were found to be poor among female college freshmen in mainland China. Having a positive attitude toward HPV vaccination, creating vaccine-friendly social norms, and removing related barriers are important measures to promote HPV immunization.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMotivationPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CareSexual BehaviorSociodemographic FactorsYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesChinacollege female freshmenhuman papillomavirus vaccineinformation–motivation–behavior skillswillingness

Identifiers

PMID34634207
PMCPMC8516380
OpenAlexW3205810624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.