Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34634032›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Selective sorting of ancestral introgression in maize and teosinte along an elevational cline.

Erin Calfee, Daniel Gates, Anne Lorant, M Taylor Perkins, Graham Coop, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution of genome-wide barriers to gene flow during complex speciation in rattlesnakes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An ancient origin of the naked grains of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin CalfeeCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2145-1866
Daniel GatesDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Anne LorantDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-923X
M Taylor PerkinsDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-0527
Graham CoopCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-0302
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-4954
University of California, Davis · USPlant (United States) · US

Funding

The impact of natural selection and population structure on human genomic variationR35GM136290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Graham Coop · 2020 to 2026
$2.6M
Genome-wide approaches to polygenic adaptationR01GM108779 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COOP, GRAHAM · 2014 to 2019
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108779NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While often deleterious, hybridization can also be a key source of genetic variation and pre-adapted haplotypes, enabling rapid evolution and niche expansion. Here we evaluate these opposing selection forces on introgressed ancestry between maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and its wild teosinte relative, mexicana (Zea mays ssp. mexicana). Introgression from ecologically diverse teosinte may have facilitated maize's global range expansion, in particular to challenging high elevation regions (> 1500 m). We generated low-coverage genome sequencing data for 348 maize and mexicana individuals to evaluate patterns of introgression in 14 sympatric population pairs, spanning the elevational range of mexicana, a teosinte endemic to the mountains of Mexico. While recent hybrids are commonly observed in sympatric populations and mexicana demonstrates fine-scale local adaptation, we find that the majority of mexicana ancestry tracts introgressed into maize over 1000 generations ago. This mexicana ancestry seems to have maintained much of its diversity and likely came from a common ancestral source, rather than contemporary sympatric populations, resulting in relatively low FST between mexicana ancestry tracts sampled from geographically distant maize populations. Introgressed mexicana ancestry in maize is reduced in lower-recombination rate quintiles of the genome and around domestication genes, consistent with pervasive selection against introgression. However, we also find mexicana ancestry increases across the sampled elevational gradient and that high introgression peaks are most commonly shared among high-elevation maize populations, consistent with introgression from mexicana facilitating adaptation to the highland environment. In the other direction, we find patterns consistent with adaptive and clinal introgression of maize ancestry into sympatric mexicana at many loci across the genome, suggesting that maize also contributes to adaptation in mexicana, especially at the lower end of its elevational range. In sympatric maize, in addition to high introgression regions we find many genomic regions where selection for local adaptation maintains steep gradients in introgressed mexicana ancestry across elevation, including at least two inversions: the well-characterized 14 Mb Inv4m on chromosome 4 and a novel 3 Mb inversion Inv9f surrounding the macrohairless1 locus on chromosome 9. Most outlier loci with high mexicana introgression show no signals of sweeps or local sourcing from sympatric populations and so likely represent ancestral introgression sorted by selection, resulting in correlated but distinct outcomes of introgression in different contemporary maize populations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalChromosome InversionChromosome MappingGenome, PlantHaplotypesHybridization, GeneticMexicoZea mays

Identifiers

PMID34634032
PMCPMC8530355
OpenAlexW3207224239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.