Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34633905›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2022

Influence of implant variations on survival of the Lubinus SP II stem: evaluation of 76,530 hips in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register, 2000-2018.

Raed Itayem, Ola Rolfson, Maziar Mohaddes, Johan Kärrholm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Experience of an anatomic femoral stem in a UK orthopaedic centre beyond 20 years of follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raed ItayemDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg; The Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden. itayem_r@hotmail.com.
Ola RolfsonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg; The Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden. ola.rolfson@vgregion.se.
Maziar MohaddesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg; The Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden. maziar.mohaddes_ardebili@vgregion.se.
Johan KärrholmDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg; The Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden. johan.karrholm@vgregion.se.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Almost all prosthetic implant brands include several variations. Most studies on implant performance investigate an implant system without sub-analysis of implant attributes. We studied the influence of design variations during the last 2 decades on implant survival of the most frequently used cemented femoral stem, the Lubinus SPII, reported to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). Patients and methods - Between 2000 and 2018, 100,032 cemented Lubinus SP II stems had been reported to SHAR. Patients with primary osteoarthritis operated on with stem length 150 mm together with a cemented cup from the same manufacturer (n = 76,530) were included in this analysis. Primary study outcome was non-infectious stem revision. Cox regression with adjustment for age, sex, surgical approach, and year of surgery was used. Hazard rates (HR) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results - Average follow-up was 7.6 years (SD 4.2). At 18 years the overall stem survival was 99.1 (CI 98.9-99.3). Increased revision rate was observed for stems with extra offset, when a long or an extra-long head length had been used. Smaller stem sizes, in particular the smallest stem size (01), substantially increased the rate of mechanical failure as reflected by an almost 10 times increased rate of revision compared with the standard size (2). Interpretation - In this study with larger sample size and longer follow-up than previously presented from the same register, we observed more pronounced effects of previously documented design variations. Based on our results, surgeons using the Lubinus SPII stems are advised to consider an alternative solution if a Lubinus stem size 01, Lubinus extra offset, or an extra-long head seems to be the most suitable choice at the preoperative planning.

Indexed as

Hip ProsthesisProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone CementsFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesSwedenBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID34633905
PMCPMC8815278
OpenAlexW3205263248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.