Similarities and Differences between Na

We have compared distributions of sodium and potassium ions around double-stranded DNA, simulated using fixed charge SPC/E, TIP3P, and OPC water models and the Joung/Cheatham (J/C) ion parameter set, as well as the Li/Merz HFE 6-12 (L/M HFE) ion parameters for OPC water. In all the simulations, the ion distributions are in qualitative agreement with Manning's condensation theory and the Debye-Hückel theory, where expected. In agreement with experiment, binding affinity of monovalent ions to DNA does not depend on ion type in every solvent model. However, behavior of deeply bound ions, including ions bound to specific sites, depends strongly on the solvent model. In particular, the number of potassium ions in the minor groove of AT-tracts differs at least 3-fold between the solvent models tested. The number of sodium ions associated with the DNA agrees quantitatively with the experiment for the OPC water model, followed closely by TIP3P+J/C; the largest deviation from the experiment, ∼10%, is seen for SPC/E+J/C. On the other hand, SPC/E+J/C model is most consistent (67%) with the experimental potassium binding sites, followed by OPC+J/C (60%), TIP3P+J/C (53%), and OPC+L/M HFE (27%). The use of NBFIX correction with TIP3P+J/C improves its consistency with the experiment. In summary, the choice of the solvent model matters little for simulating the diffuse atmosphere of sodium and potassium ions around DNA, but ion distributions become increasingly sensitive to the solvent model near the helical axis. We offer an explanation for these trends. There is no single gold standard solvent model, although OPC water with J/C ions or TIP3P with J/C + NBFIX may offer an imperfect compromise for practical simulations of ionic atmospheres around DNA.