Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34633570›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Developing a feasible and sensitive judgement bias task in dairy cows.

Louise Kremer, Cornelis G van Reenen, Bas Engel, Eddie A M Bokkers, Sabine K Schnabel, Jozef T N van der Werf, Laura E Webb

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louise KremerAnimal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. louise.kremer@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-6848
Cornelis G van ReenenAnimal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bas EngelBiometris, Wageningen University, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eddie A M BokkersAnimal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7600
Sabine K SchnabelBiometris, Wageningen University, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2338-3019
Jozef T N van der WerfWageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Laura E WebbAnimal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-4294
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit TKI-AF-16162Nederlandse Zuivel Organisatie TKI-AF-16162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Judgement bias tasks (JBTs) are used to assess the influence of farm practices on livestock affective states. The tasks must be adjusted to the species and age group of focus. In cattle, most JBTs were designed for calves instead of adult cows. This study aimed to develop a JBT suitable for adult dairy cows, combining feasibility, validity, sensitivity and repeatability. Three JBTs were developed in which cows were trained to reach or avoid reaching a feeder, the location of which signalled a reward or punisher. The tasks differed in terms of punisher-cows being allocated either to "no-reward", an air puff or an electric shock. Cows were then exposed twice to three ambiguous positions of the feeder, on two separate occasions. Speed of learning and proportions of correct responses to the conditioned locations were used to assess the feasibility of the task. Adjusted latencies to reach the ambiguous feeder positions were used to examine whether response patterns matched the linear and monotonic graded pattern expected in a valid and sensitive JBT at baseline. Latencies to reach the feeders in the two repeated testing sessions were compared to assess ambiguity loss over tasks' repetitions. The validity of using spatial JBTs for dairy cows was demonstrated. While the effect on JBT feasibility was nuanced, the punisher did influence JBT sensitivity. None of the JBTs' repeatability could be supported. We conclude that using an air puf as punisher led to the most sensitive, yet non-repeatable, JBT for dairy cows.

Indexed as

JudgmentRewardAnimalsBiasCattleEmotionsFemaleLearningAffective stateCowsFeasibilityJudgement biasPunisherSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID34633570
PMCPMC8940804
OpenAlexW3205857415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.