ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021
Difference in the binding mechanisms of ABT-263/43b with Bcl-xL/Bcl-2: computational perspective on the accurate binding free energy analysis.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
B-cell lymphoma/leukemia gene-2(Bcl-2) protein family known for regulating cell cycle arrest and subsequent cell death is highly expressed in a variety of cancers. Among them, the Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 are two essential proteins in the Bcl-2 family. In the present work, the differences in binding modes as between the two proteins and two ligands ABT-263/43b were investigated and compared. And the computational alanine scanning combined with the recently developed interaction entropy (AS-IE) method was employed for predicting their binding free energies and finding those amino acids that were more critical during the binding process. The result showed that the binding free energy calculated by the AS-IE method was more in line with experimental values than the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method. Besides, no significant difference was found between Bcl-xL and ABT-263/43b in the binding free energy, which Bcl-xL showed slightly weaker binding free energy to 43b because of the fewer number of key residues with interactions. Nonetheless, compared with the Bcl-2 and 43b complex, the Bcl-2 and ABT-263 system had greater number of key residues interacting with ABT-263, in particular, contribute favorably, resulting in a stronger binding ability for the Bcl-2 and ABT-263 systems. The van der Waals and hydrogen bond contributions were significant in the four protein-ligand complexes. Overall, Tyr108 was found to be the common key residues in the Bcl-xL-ligand complex, while Tyr105, Glu100, and Glu143 were established as the common key residue in the Bcl-2-ligand systems. We hope that the predicted hot spot residues and their energy distributions can guide the design of peptide and small-molecule drugs targeting Bcl-xL and Bcl-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.