ArticleBrain structure & function2022
Structure can predict function in the human brain: a graph neural network deep learning model of functional connectivity and centrality based on structural connectivity.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disrupted thalamic functional hierarchy on resting-state fMRI in idiopathic generalized epilepsy.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Integrated anatomical and functional connectivity mapping in episodic migraine: a spectral graph theory approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of structural connectivity on brain function through a Markov model of signal transmission.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Krakencoder: a unified brain connectome translation and fusion tool.Nature methods · 2025Article
- The role of structural connectivity on brain function through a Markov model of signal transmission.PloS one · 2025Article
- Dynamic network features of functional and structural brain networks support visual working memory in aging adults.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Audiovisual integration and whole-brain networks in preterm and full-term neonates: A two-layer multiplex network perspective on structural and functional connectivity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A within-subject voxel-wise constant-block partial least squares correlation method to explore MRI-based brain structure-function relationship.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Predicting an individual's functional connectivity from their structural connectome: Evaluation of evidence, recommendations, and future prospects.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Reorganization of structural connectivity in the brain supports preservation of cognitive ability in healthy aging.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Group-common and individual-specific effects of structure-function coupling in human brain networks with graph neural networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Early development of the functional brain network in newborns.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
- Comparing models of information transfer in the structural brain network and their relationship to functional connectivity: diffusion versus shortest path routing.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although functional connectivity and associated graph theory measures (e.g., centrality; how centrally important to the network a region is) are widely used in brain research, the full extent to which these functional measures are related to the underlying structural connectivity is not yet fully understood. Graph neural network deep learning methods have not yet been applied for this purpose, and offer an ideal model architecture for working with connectivity data given their ability to capture and maintain inherent network structure. Here, we applied this model to predict functional connectivity from structural connectivity in a sample of 998 participants from the Human Connectome Project. Our results showed that the graph neural network accounted for 89% of the variance in mean functional connectivity, 56% of the variance in individual-level functional connectivity, 99% of the variance in mean functional centrality, and 81% of the variance in individual-level functional centrality. These results represent an important finding that functional centrality can be robustly predicted from structural connectivity. Regions of particular importance to the model's performance as determined through lesioning are discussed, whereby regions with higher centrality have a higher impact on model performance. Future research on models of patient, demographic, or behavioural data can also benefit from this graph neural network method as it is ideally-suited for depicting connectivity and centrality in brain networks. These results have set a new benchmark for prediction of functional connectivity from structural connectivity, and models like this may ultimately lead to a way to predict functional connectivity in individuals who are unable to do fMRI tasks (e.g., non-responsive patients).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.