Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34633504›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2021

Wearable activity trackers and artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatic diseases : Where are we in 2021?

Thomas Davergne, Joanna Kedra, Laure Gossec

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Wearables in rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas DavergneINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France. thomas.davergne@efom.fr.
Joanna KedraINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France.
Laure GossecINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable activity trackers are playing an increasingly important role in healthcare. In the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), various applications are currently possible. This review will present the use of activity trackers to promote physical activity levels in rheumatology, as well as the use of trackers to measure health parameters and detect flares using artificial intelligence. Challenges and limitations of the use of artificial intelligence will be discussed, as well as technical issues when using activity trackers in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Rheumatic DiseasesRheumatologyArtificial IntelligenceExerciseFitness TrackersHumansDigitizationDisease flaresE‑healthPhysical exerciseRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34633504
PMCPMC8503875
OpenAlexW3205452341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.