Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34633172›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2021

A Biosynthetic Hybrid Spidroin-Amyloid-Mussel Foot Protein for Underwater Adhesion on Diverse Surfaces.

Eugene Kim, Juya Jeon, Yaguang Zhu, Ethan D Hoppe, Young-Shin Jun, Guy M Genin, Fuzhong Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Technologies for engineering repetitive DNA.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. EnhancingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Microbial Production of High-Performance Fibers from Muscle Protein Titin.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugene KimDepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Juya JeonDepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Yaguang ZhuDepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-4491
Ethan D HoppeNSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering MechanoBiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Young-Shin JunDepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Guy M GeninNSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering MechanoBiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-4729
Fuzhong ZhangDepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-7909
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103422 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YARASHESKI, KEVIN E · 2012 to 2019
$12.0M
Electric Field-stimulated Protein MechanicsP41GM118217 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI RANGANATHAN, RAMA · 2019 to 2021
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103422NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM118217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strong underwater adhesives are attractive materials for biomedical healing and underwater repair, but their success in applications has been limited, owing to challenges with underwater setting and with balancing surface adhesion and cohesion. Here, we applied synthetic biology approaches to overcome these challenges through design and synthesis of a novel hybrid protein consisting of the zipper-forming domains of an amyloid protein, flexible spider silk sequences, and a dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA)-containing mussel foot protein (Mfp). This partially structured, hybrid protein can self-assemble into a semi-crystalline hydrogel that exhibits high strength and toughness as well as strong underwater adhesion to a variety of surfaces, including difficult-to-adhere plastics, tendon, and skin. The hydrogel allows selective debonding by oxidation or iron-chelating treatments. Both the material design and the biosynthetic approach explored in this study will inspire future work for a wide range of hybrid protein-based materials with tunable properties and broad applications.

Indexed as

AdhesivenessAdhesivesAmyloidogenic ProteinsAnimalsBivalviaFibroinsHydrogelsProtein EngineeringProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSpidersViscoelastic SubstancesWateradhesive protein, musselAdhesivesAmyloidogenic ProteinsFibroinsHydrogelsProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsViscoelastic SubstancesWateramyloid beta-peptidesmussel foot proteinprotein materialssynthetic biologyunderwater adhesive

Identifiers

PMID34633172
PMCPMC10041942
OpenAlexW3206341514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.