ArticleEpilepsia2021
Post hoc analysis of a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study of cenobamate for treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures: Effects of dose adjustments of concomitant antiseizure medications.
Article in Epilepsia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Trial
- Onset of efficacy and adverse events during Cenobamate titration period.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2022Trial
- Narrative Review: Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Newer Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Focal Epilepsy: A New Benchmark in Treatment Outcomes?Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Early Add-On Cenobamate in Uncontrolled Focal Epilepsy: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- DECREASE study: A European pool-analysis of patients with significant reductions in concomitant antiseizure medications in cenobamate Early Access Programs.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Effect of Concomitant Medications on Adverse Event Frequency, Severity, and Time to Resolution in a Cenobamate Open-Label Trial.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism in chronic epilepsy: a call to action!Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Review
- Effectiveness and safety of cenobamate after conversion to monotherapy or dual therapy in real-world clinical practice.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Observational
- Cenobamate in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: real-world evidence from a two-center retrospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of long-term treatment with cenobamate on concomitant usage of antiseizure medications: A real-world retrospective study in Spain.Epilepsia · 2026Observational
- Observational
- Development and validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting suboptimal concentration of valproate in pediatric with epilepsy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Early antiseizure response to cenobamate (200 mg/day) in focal drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective single-center analysis.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- Observational
- Cenobamate: A Review in Focal-Onset Seizures.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Observational
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report post hoc results on how adjustments to baseline antiseizure medications (ASMs) in a subset of study sites (10 US sites) from a long-term, open-label phase 3 study of adjunctive cenobamate affected tolerability, efficacy, and retention.
methodsPatients with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of one to three ASMs were administered increasing doses of cenobamate (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/day) over 12 weeks at 2-week intervals (target dose = 200 mg/day). Further increases to 400 mg/day by 50 mg/day biweekly increments were allowed during maintenance phase. Dose adjustments of cenobamate and concomitant ASMs were allowed. Data were assessed until last visit, at data cut-off, on or after September 1, 2019.
resultsA total of 240 patients meeting eligibility criteria were assessed (median [max] exposure 30.2 [43.0] months), with 177 patients continuing cenobamate at data cut-off. Most common baseline concomitant ASMs were lacosamide, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, zonisamide, and clobazam. For most baseline concomitant ASMs, ~70% of patients taking that ASM were continuing cenobamate at data cut-off. Patients continuing cenobamate had greater mean ASM dose reductions and percent dose changes from baseline vs those who discontinued. Of patients continuing cenobamate, 24.6% discontinued one or more concomitant ASMs completely. Dose decreases for all concomitant ASMs generally occurred during titration or early maintenance phases and were mostly due to central nervous system (CNS)-related adverse events such as somnolence, dizziness, unsteady gait, and fatigue. Responder rates from ≥50% through 100% for patients continuing cenobamate were generally similar regardless of concomitant ASMs (of those most commonly taken), with ~81% being ≥50% responders and ~12% achieving 100% seizure reduction in the maintenance phase, which lasted up to 40.2 (median = 29.5) months. SIGNIFICANCE: Concomitant ASM dose reductions were associated with more patients remaining on cenobamate. This is likely due to efficacy and improved tolerability, with overall reduced concomitant drug burden in patients with uncontrolled seizures despite taking one to three baseline concomitant ASMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.