Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34632897›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2021

Sepsis in end-stage renal disease patients: are they at an increased risk of mortality?

Ralphe Bou Chebl, Hani Tamim, Gilbert Abou Dagher, Musharaf Sadat, Ghassan Ghamdi, Abdulrahman Itani, Alawi Saeedi, Yaseen M Arabi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ralphe Bou CheblDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hani TamimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gilbert Abou DagherDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Musharaf SadatIntensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ghassan GhamdiIntensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman ItaniIntensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Alawi SaeediIntensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Yaseen M ArabiIntensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-6241
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAAmerican University of Beirut · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to examine the outcome of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted with sepsis to the intensive care unit (ICU).

designSingle centre, retrospective cohort study.

settingThe study was conducted in the Intensive Care Department of King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

participantsData were extracted from a prospectively collected ICU database from 2002 to 2017. Patients were considered to have sepsis based on the sepsis-3 definition and were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of ESRD. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and mechanical ventilation duration.

resultsA total of 8803 patients were admitted to the ICU with sepsis during the study period. 730 (8.3%) patients had ESRD. 49.04% of ESRD patients with sepsis died within their hospital stay vs. 31.78% of non-ESRD patients. ESRD septic patients had 1.44 greater odds of dying within their hospital stay as compared to septic non-ESRD patients (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-1.53). Finally, the predictors of hospital mortality in septic ESRD patients were found to be mechanical ventilation (OR 3.36; 95% CI 2.27-5.00), a history of chronic liver disease (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.26-4.07), and use of vasopressors (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.19-2.54). Among patients with ESRD, hospital mortality was higher in subgroups of patients with chronic cardiac (OR 1.86 (1.36-2.53) vs. 1.19 (0.96-1.47)) and chronic respiratory illnesses (OR 2.20 (1.52-3.20) vs. 1.21 (0.99-1.48)).

conclusionESRD patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis are at greater odds of mortality compared to patients with non-ESRD. This risk is particularly increased if these patients have a concomitant history of chronic cardiac and respiratory illnesses.Key MessagesSepsis and bacterial infections are very common in ESRD patients and following cardiovascular disease; sepsis is the second leading cause of death in patients with ESRD.This study aims to examine the outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted with sepsis to the intensive care unit (ICU).The results of this study have shown that end-stage renal disease is associated with greater odds of ICU and hospital mortality among septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit.ESRD patients were also more likely to be started on vasopressors and mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKidney Failure, ChronicLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaSepsisSurvival Ratecritical careESRDintensive carelengths of staymortalitysepsis

Identifiers

PMID34632897
PMCPMC8510599
OpenAlexW3205696019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.