Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34632735›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Evaluation of elderly women with uterin cervical cancer.

Özer Birge, Mehmet Sait Bakır, Ceyda Karadag, Selen Doğan, Hasan Aykut Tuncer, Tayup Simsek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of elderly women with uterin cervical cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Özer BirgeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-3743
Mehmet Sait BakırDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-4339
Ceyda KaradagDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9557-0932
Selen DoğanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-5581
Hasan Aykut TuncerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5434-1025
Tayup SimsekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-3970
Akdeniz University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine cervical cancer rates also increase with aging. Especially, the primary treatments of patients with cervical cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.

aimOur aim is to discuss the effect of clinical and histopathological risk factors on survival in patients over 65 years old with invasive cervical cancer in the light of the literature. METHODS AND

resultsThe files of 60 patients aged 65 and over who were diagnosed, examined, and treated for invasive cervical uteri cancer between 2004 and 2021 by the gynecological oncology clinic of Akdeniz University were analyzed retrospectively after obtaining approval from the Akdeniz University ethics committee with the number KAEK-110. Detailed written consent was obtained from all patients and their relatives for data analysis. Patients aged 65 and over who were diagnosed with invasive cervical uteri cancer at all stages who accepted treatment were included in the study. The patients who were not included in the study were those who did not accept treatment, did not continue their follow-up regularly, were under 65 years of age, had preinvasive cervical lesion, had a second primary cancer, had an unknown stage, and died due to accidents or similar reasons. When the demographic data of 60 cases were examined, the mean age was 70.5, the youngest age was 65, and the oldest age was 84. When we divided them into two groups by age groups, 76.7% were between 65 and 75 years old and 23.3% were over 75 years old. When the data of 60 patients who were referred to our hospital, which was a tertiary center in the 15 years duration, were examined, the mean disease-progression free survival (PFS) of patients with locally advanced stage was 45 months, however, it was 4 months for metastatic patients, this difference was significant and a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p: .001). When the total survival was examined, the mean was 108.7 months in the locally advanced stage group, while it was 2.9 months in metastatic cases, and this difference was also statistically significant between the two groups (p: .001). When we divide the cases into two groups as between 65 and 75 and over 75 years of age, the mean age of disease-free survival is 76.9 months in the 65-75 years old group, while 16 months in the 76-85 years old group, however, the p value of this difference in PFS between the two groups was not significant (p: 0.154). However, when the total survival was examined, it was seen that the mean was 140.4 in the 65-75 years old group, while it was 56 months in the 76-85 years old group and this difference was significant between the two groups (p: .046).

conclusionIn parallel with the increased population worldwide, advanced age cancer rates are increasing. In parallel with the population growth, it should be remembered that the patients over 65 years of age who were diagnosed with invasive uterine cervical cancer had difficulty in accessing screening tests, late diagnosis and inadequate treatment regimens due to concomitant diseases, resulting in recurrence in a short time and poor clinical symptoms due to short total survival.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorselderly womenevaluationuterine cervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID34632735
PMCPMC9575482
OpenAlexW3205877911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.