Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34632532›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2022

Influence of Pre-operative HbA1c on Bariatric Surgery Outcomes-the Sunderland (UK) Experience.

Nehemiah Samuel, Abdalla Mustafa, Helen Hawkins, Nicholas Wei, Maureen Boyle, Nimantha De Alwis, Peter Small, Kamal Mahawar, William Carr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nehemiah SamuelDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Abdalla MustafaDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK. drabdoosh@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8633-1887
Helen HawkinsDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Nicholas WeiDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Maureen BoyleDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Nimantha De AlwisDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Peter SmallDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Kamal MahawarDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
William CarrDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Sunderland Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUK guidelines recommend an HbA1c < 8.5% prior to elective surgery. Optimisation of pre-operative glycaemic control can be often difficult. Aim to correlate the effect of pre-operative HbA1c on the peri-operative complication rates and whether elective bariatric surgery should be delayed in poorly controlled diabetics. MATERIAL AND

methodsRetrospective data of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, one-anastomosis gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy during January 2014 and April 2018. Patients were categorised into group 1, non-diabetics with an HbA1c < 6.5%; group 2, well-controlled diabetics with HbA1c between 6.5 and 8.4%; and group 3, poorly controlled diabetics with HbA1c ≥ 8.5%. Primary outcome was peri-operative complication rates.

resultsGroup 1 (n = 978), 81.8% female, median (i.q.r.) age 44.0 (34-52) years, median (i.q.r.) BMI 42.0 (38.7-46.7); group 2 (n = 350), 66.3% female, age 51.0 (45-59) years, BMI 41.8 (37.5-46.5); and group 3 (n = 90), 60% female, age 52.0 (45-56) years and BMI 41.4(36.9-44.8). Early complication rates in each group were low, 1.0% vs 1.7% vs 1.1% (p = 0.592). Mean length of stay was 2 days across the groups (p > 0.05). There was no difference in 30-day re-admission rates between groups 2.8%, 2.9% and 3.3% (p = 0.983). At 6 months and 1 year, there was sustained and equal reduction in HbA1c in all groups (p < 0.05).

conclusionPatients undergoing metabolic surgery for poorly controlled diabetes achieve non-inferior peri-operative outcomes. Hence, delaying metabolic surgery in an attempt to optimise diabetic control is not justifiable.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultFemaleGastrectomyGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomWeight LossGlycated HemoglobinBariatric surgeryDiabetesHbA1cObesity

Identifiers

PMID34632532
OpenAlexW3207408948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.