Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34632459›Full record

ReviewFaculty reviews2021

Penile implant surgery-managing complications.

Axel Alberto Cayetano-Alcaraz, Musaab Yassin, Ankit Desai, Tharu Tharakan, Georgios Tsampoukas, Martina Zurli, Suks Minhas

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Faculty reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Axel Alberto Cayetano-AlcarazAndrology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross, London, UK.
Musaab YassinAndrology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross, London, UK.
Ankit DesaiAndrology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross, London, UK.
Tharu TharakanAndrology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross, London, UK.
Georgios TsampoukasUrology Department, Princess Alexandria Hospital, Harlow, UK.
Martina ZurliAndrology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross, London, UK.
Suks MinhasAndrology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBPrincess Alexandra Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile prosthesis surgery represents the end-stage treatment for erectile dysfunction. It is conventionally used only in cases of erectile dysfunction refractory to pharmacological treatments or vacuum constriction devices. Contemporary literature suggests that penile prothesis surgery is associated with a high satisfaction rate and a low complication profile. However, it must be appreciated that the complications of surgery can have devastating consequences on a patient's quality of life and satisfaction and include infection, prosthesis malfunction, penile corporal perforation and penile length loss. Several factors - such as appropriate patient selection, methodical preoperative assessment and patient optimization, specific intraoperative protocols and postoperative recommendations - can reduce the risk of surgical complications. This narrative review discusses the diagnosis and management of both intraoperative and postoperative complications of penile prosthesis surgery.

Indexed as

erectile dysfunction surgeryglans ischemiaglans necrosisinflatable penile prosthesis (IPP)instrumentationPenile implantationpenile prosthesispreoperative careprosthesis implantationprosthesis-related infectionsreoperationrisk factorssalvage therapyurethra

Identifiers

PMID34632459
PMCPMC8483239
OpenAlexW3204737770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.