Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34632447›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

Emergency physician risk of occupational mortality: A scoping review.

Craig Goolsby, Vidya Lala, Riley Gebner, Nicole Dacuyan-Faucher, Nathan Charlton, Keke Schuler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emergency physician risk of occupational mortality: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Craig GoolsbyDepartment of Military and Emergency Medicine Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Bethesda Maryland USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-8764
Vidya LalaSchool of Medicine Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Bethesda Maryland USA.
Riley GebnerSchool of Medicine Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Bethesda Maryland USA.
Nicole Dacuyan-FaucherNational Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health Rockville Maryland USA.
Nathan CharltonDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA.
Keke SchulerNational Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health Rockville Maryland USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational hazards for emergency physicians are widely known, but the risk of work-related mortality is not clear. The COVID-19 pandemic generated new concerns about the risk of occupational mortality, particularly in the setting of inadequate personal protective equipment. The perception of increased risk generated ethical concerns regarding emergency physicians' duty to treat and employers' duty to protect their employees. We performed this scoping review to define prepandemic emergency physician occupational mortality.

methodsWe performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed publications from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in September 2020.

resultsOf the 747 unique articles identified in the 3 databases, 1 article met inclusion criteria and was included in the final analysis.

conclusionThe baseline risk of occupational mortality for emergency physicians is not established in the scientific literature. Further study is needed to quantify risk, as this information would be useful to shape policy and ethical considerations.

Indexed as

duty to treatemergency physician deathoccupational mortalityoccupational riskworkplace injury

Identifiers

PMID34632447
PMCPMC8490339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.