ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2020
An NMF-based approach to discover overlooked differentially expressed gene regions from single-cell RNA-seq data.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linear Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Analyzing Structured Biomedical Data: Existing Research and Future Opportunities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics · 2025Review
- Robust and annotation-free analysis of alternative splicing across diverse cell types in mice.eLife · 2022Article
- Single-cell differential splicing analysis reveals high heterogeneity of liver tumor-infiltrating T cells.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Millefy: visualizing cell-to-cell heterogeneity in read coverage of single-cell RNA sequencing datasets.BMC genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing has enabled researchers to quantify the transcriptomes of individual cells, infer cell types and investigate differential expression among cell types, which will lead to a better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of cell states. Transcript diversity caused by phenomena such as aberrant splicing events have been revealed, and differential expression of previously unannotated transcripts might be overlooked by annotation-based analyses. Accordingly, we have developed an approach to discover overlooked differentially expressed (DE) gene regions that complements annotation-based methods. Our algorithm decomposes mapped count data matrix for a gene region using non-negative matrix factorization, quantifies the differential expression level based on the decomposed matrix, and compares the differential expression level based on annotation-based approach to discover previously unannotated DE transcripts. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing for human neural stem cells and applied our algorithm to the dataset. We also applied our algorithm to two public single-cell RNA sequencing datasets correspond to mouse ES and primitive endoderm cells, and human preimplantation embryos. As a result, we discovered several intriguing DE transcripts, including a transcript related to the modulation of neural stem/progenitor cell differentiation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.