ArticleJAMIA open2020
Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.
Article in JAMIA open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07073898 (Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using the CFIR 2.0 Framework to Assess the Implementation of GARDE: A Population Health Management Tool for Hereditary Cancer Risk.Research square · 2026Article
- An exploratory mixed-methods study using the ELICIT framework to identify stakeholder-informed implementation strategies for a population health platform.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Combining family history and alcohol screening measures to identify emerging adults at risk of not being in education, employment, or training (NEET).Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
- Decision makers' perceptions of integrating genetic counselors into primary care.Family practice · 2025Article
- Mediating Role of Trauma Connecting Psychiatric Family History and Adolescent Mental Health.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- Creating a family health history interview protocol for use with undergraduate health professional students: A scoping review.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Identification of Individuals With Hereditary Cancer Risk Through Multiple Data Sources: A Population-Based Method Using the GARDE Platform and The Utah Population Database.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Usability, Engagement, and Report Usefulness of Chatbot-Based Family Health History Data Collection: Mixed Methods Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The UTHealth Houston Adult Cardiovascular Genomics Certificate Program: Efficacy and Impact on Healthcare Professionals.Research square · 2024Article
- Evaluating a New Digital App-Based Program for Heart Health: Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Barriers to family history collection among Spanish-speaking primary care patients: a BRIDGE qualitative study.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Identifying Patients Who Meet Criteria for Genetic Testing of Hereditary Cancers Based on Structured and Unstructured Family Health History Data in the Electronic Health Record: Natural Language Processing Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Current state and future directions of genomic medicine in aortic dissection: A path to prevention and personalized care.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2022Review
- Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Innovations and Opportunities.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Review
- Refining a Postpandemic Approach to Cancer Screening.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021Article
- Comparison of a Focused Family Cancer History Questionnaire to Family History Documentation in the Electronic Medical Record.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify needs in a clinical decision support tool development by exploring how primary care providers currently collect and use family health history (FHH).
designSurvey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to a mix of primary and specialty care clinicians within the University of Utah Health system (40 surveys, 12 interviews).
resultsThree key themes emerged regarding providers' collection and use of FHH: (1) Strategies for collecting FHH vary by level of effort; (2) Documentation practices extend beyond the electronic health record's dedicated FHH module; and (3) Providers desire feedback from genetic services consultation and are uncertain how to refer patients to genetic services.
conclusionStudy findings highlight the varying degrees of engagement that providers have with collecting FHH. Improving the integration of FHH into workflow, and providing decision support, as well as links and tools to help providers better utilize genetic counseling may improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.