Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34632164›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2021

PCL and PCL/bioactive glass biomaterials as carriers for biologically active polyphenolic compounds: Comprehensive physicochemical and biological evaluation.

Michal Dziadek, Kinga Dziadek, Kamila Checinska, Barbara Zagrajczuk, Monika Golda-Cepa, Monika Brzychczy-Wloch, Elzbieta Menaszek, Aneta Kopec, Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Recent Advances in the Control of Clinically Important Biofilms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michal DziadekJagiellonian University, Faculty of Chemistry, 2 Gronostajowa St., 30-387, Krakow, Poland.
Kinga DziadekUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Food Technology, Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 122 Balicka St., 30-149, Krakow, Poland.
Kamila ChecinskaAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, Department of Glass Technology and Amorphous Coatings, 30 Mickiewicza Ave., 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
Barbara ZagrajczukAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, Department of Glass Technology and Amorphous Coatings, 30 Mickiewicza Ave., 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
Monika Golda-CepaJagiellonian University, Faculty of Chemistry, 2 Gronostajowa St., 30-387, Krakow, Poland.
Monika Brzychczy-WlochJagiellonian University, Medical College, Department of Molecular Medical Microbiology, 18 Czysta St., 31-121, Krakow, Poland.
Elzbieta MenaszekJagiellonian University, Medical College, Department of Cytobiology, 9 Medyczna St., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Aneta KopecUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Food Technology, Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 122 Balicka St., 30-149, Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna Cholewa-KowalskaAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, Department of Glass Technology and Amorphous Coatings, 30 Mickiewicza Ave., 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, polymeric and bioactive glass (BG)-modified composite films were successfully loaded with polyphenols (PPh) extracted from sage. It was hypothesized that PPh, alone and in combination with BGs particles, would affect physicochemical and biological properties of the films. Furthermore, sol-gel-derived BG particles would serve as an agent for control the release of the polyphenolic compounds, and other important properties related to the presence of PPh. The results showed that polyphenolic compounds significantly modified numerous material properties and also acted as biologically active substances. On the one hand, PPh can be considered as plasticizers for PCL, on the other hand, they can act as coupling agent in composite materials, improving their mechanical performance. The presence of PPh in materials improved their hydrophilicity and apatite-forming ability, and also provided antioxidant activity. What is important is that the aforementioned properties and kinetics of PPh release can be modulated by the use of various concentrations of PPh, and by the modification of PCL matrix with sol-gel-derived BG particles, capable of binding PPh. The films containing the lowest concentration of PPh exhibited cytocompatibility, significantly increased alkaline phosphatase activity and the expression of bone extracellular matrix proteins (osteocalcin and osteopontin) in human normal osteoblasts, while they reduced intracellular reactive oxygen species production in macrophages. Furthermore, materials loaded with PPh showed antibiofilm properties against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. The results suggest that obtained materials represent potential multifunctional biomaterials for bone tissue engineering with a wide range of tunable properties.

Indexed as

Antioxidant propertiesDrug deliveryPlant extractTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34632164
PMCPMC8484899
OpenAlexW3111134020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.