ArticleHealth science reports2021
Clinical experience with a new injectable hyaluronic acid designed to improve skin quality in a private clinic in Brazil: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Health science reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Profhilo® and Profhilo® Body.Plastic and aesthetic nursingPooled it
- Efficacy and Durability of the Association of Botox and Skinvive in the Treatment of Moderate/Severe Wrinkles in the Periorbital Region: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Split-Face Clinical Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Intradermal "Skin Boosters": Are We Targeting Too Superficially?Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- When Genes Meet Gels: Computational Immunogenetics of Dermal Fillers and Stratified Risk of Immune and Fibrotic Reactions across Compositions and Genotypes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Hyaluronic Acid ProfhiloMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Round Table Discussion: Aesthetic Treatment Considerations for the Perimenopausal & Menopausal Patient.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Decades of Scientific Data and Global Media Reporting on Complications in Non-surgical Aesthetic Treatments for a Transparent Safety Profile: Kissing Snow White Awake.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Integrating VYC-12L With Energy-Based Devices for Skin-Quality Improvement: Global Expert Considerations for Safe and Effective Outcomes.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Skin Improvement in Japanese Patients With Inflammatory Dermatologic Conditions Using the Injectable Hyaluronic Acid VYC-12.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Clinical experience with a new injectable hyaluronic acid designed to improve skin quality in a private clinic in Brazil: A retrospective cohort study.Health science reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJuvéderm Volite is a skin-conditioning hyaluronic acid (HA) gel for intradermal injection that provides longer-lasting effects with a lower concentration of hyaluronic acid. Few studies evaluating its use for aesthetic purposes are available.
aimTo examine the use and safety of Juvéderm Volite in daily clinical practice.
methodsA retrospective cohort study of subjects treated with Juvéderm Volite for aesthetic purposes from May 2018 to October 2019 in Rio de Janeiro. Data were extracted from the attending physician's records obtained at each medical appointment. Subjects were assessed according to their age group and treatment characteristics, which include the use of cannulas vs needles and the effectiveness and safety of associated treatments in a single session. Need for subsequent treatment was stratified by touch-up treatment (<3-month period) and repeat treatment (≥3-month period). Safety assessment was based on the report of nodule formation and late hypersensitivity in patients. Appropriate statistical tests were used for data analysis.
resultsOne hundred and eight subjects were included in the study analysis. The total number of treatment sessions consisted of 159, with a mean follow-up time of 300.3 days. Of the total 108 subjects, 8.4% required touch-up treatment for optimum correction and repeat treatment occurred in 9.0%. No cases of adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.
conclusionsThis study has shown, based on clinical observation, that Juvéderm Volite is a useful tool to improve skin quality, requiring fewer and less frequent maintenance treatments. No serious adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.