Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631998›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2021

Nursing students' attitudes toward mobile learning: An integrative review.

Bin Chen, Ting Yang, Yan Wang, Lei Xiao, Changxia Xu, Yuan Shen, Qin Qin, Yuanyuan Wang, Cheng Li, Fengqin Chen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bin ChenDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Ting YangDepartment of Nursing, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Lei XiaoDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Changxia XuDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yuan ShenDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Qin QinDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yuanyuan WangEvidence Based Nursing Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Cheng LiDepartment of Basic Teaching, Nanjing Vacational Health College, Nanjing, China.
Fengqin ChenSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yufei LengAuxiliary Teaching Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yalou PuSchool of Nursing, Suzhou Vocational Health College, Suzhou, China.
Zhiling SunSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSuzhou Vocational Health College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to explore whether the attitudes of nursing students toward the use of mobile learning are positive or negative and to identify the factors influencing their attitudes by reviewing the literature.

methodsElectronic search of six databases, including PubMed, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, was conducted, and relevant references within articles were manually searched. Retrieval time was from inception to October 21, 2020. The literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and the integrative review method. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for quality assessment.

resultsA total of 316 articles were identified, and 18 English-language studies were finally included by reviewing titles, abstracts, and full text. Six quantitative, five qualitative, and seven mixed-method articles related to nursing students' attitudes toward the use of mobile learning were identified. The results showed that most nursing students had positive attitudes toward mobile learning. Although students expressed strong intentions for mobile learning, the actual usage rate in practical settings was low. Several advantageous factors included usefulness, convenience, and ease of use, whereas disadvantageous factors included hardware facility, updated content, and software stability.

conclusionMost nursing students have positive attitudes and willingness to mobile learning, but the actual use rate remains low. Advantageous and disadvantageous factors coexist. Further studies are needed to assess how mobile learning improves nursing students' clinical knowledge and improves patient care.

Indexed as

AttitudeDistance educationLearningMobile applicationsNursing students

Identifiers

PMID34631998
PMCPMC8488805
OpenAlexW3194578722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.