ArticleBioMed research international2021
A Pyramid Architecture-Based Deep Learning Framework for Breast Cancer Detection.
Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Driven Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Imaging Modalities, Deep Learning, and Explainability.Cancers · 2026Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Breast Cancer Histopathology: Toward Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Publicly available datasets of breast histopathology H&E whole-slide images: A scoping review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- HI-Net: A novel histopathologic image segmentation model for metastatic breast cancer via lightweight dataset construction.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cancer discovery · 2024Review
- Magnifying Networks for Histopathological Images with Billions of Pixels.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in histopathology: enhancing cancer research and clinical oncology.Nature cancer · 2022Review
- Review
- Deep Learning Application for Effective Classification of Different Types of Psoriasis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosis is a critical step in clinical decision making, and this is achieved by making a pathological slide and gives a decision by the doctors, which is the method of final decision making for cancer diagnosis. Traditionally, the doctors usually check the pathological images by visual inspection under the microscope. Whole-slide images (WSIs) have supported the state-of-the-art diagnosis results and have been admitted as the gold standard clinically. However, this task is time-consuming and labour-intensive, and all of these limitations make low efficiency in decision making. Medical image processing protocols have been used for this task during the last decades and have obtained satisfactory results under some conditions; especially in the deep learning era, it has exhibited the advantages than those in the shallow learning period. In this paper, we proposed a novel breast cancer region mining framework based on deep pyramid architecture from multilevel and multiscale breast pathological WSIs. We incorporate the tissue- and cell-level information together and integrate these into a LSTM model for the final sequence modelling, which successfully keeps the WSIs' integration and is not mentioned by the prevalence frameworks. The experiment results demonstrated that our proposed framework greatly improved the detection accuracy than that only using tissue-level information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.