Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631696›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Organoid Technology: A Reliable Developmental Biology Tool for Organ-Specific Nanotoxicity Evaluation.

Minakshi Prasad, Rajesh Kumar, Lukumoni Buragohain, Ankur Kumari, Mayukh Ghosh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Recreating Human Skin In Vitro: Should the Microbiota Be Taken into Account?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Immunomodulation in age-related disorders and nanotechnology interventions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minakshi PrasadDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.
Rajesh KumarDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.
Lukumoni BuragohainDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Guwahati, India.
Ankur KumariDepartment of Zoology, CBLU, Haryana, India.
Mayukh GhoshDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, RGSC, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · INAssam Agricultural University · INBanaras Hindu University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials are bestowed with certain inherent physicochemical properties unlike their parent materials, rendering them suitable for the multifaceted needs of state-of-the-art biomedical, and pharmaceutical applications. The log-phase development of nano-science along with improved "bench to beside" conversion carries an enhanced probability of human exposure with numerous nanoparticles. Thus, toxicity assessment of these novel nanoscale materials holds a key to ensuring the safety aspects or else the global biome will certainly face a debacle. The toxicity may span from health hazards due to direct exposure to indirect means through food chain contamination or environmental pollution, even causing genotoxicity. Multiple ways of nanotoxicity evaluation include several

Indexed as

2D monoculturesgenotoxicitymicrofluidicsnanoparticlenanotoxicityorganoidsspheroids

Identifiers

PMID34631696
PMCPMC8495170
OpenAlexW3199395175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.