Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631587›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Prior Compensation Algorithm for Cerenkov Luminescence Tomography From Single-View Measurements.

Lin Wang, Xiaowei He, Jingjing Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin WangSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaowei HeSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Jingjing YuSchool of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerenkov luminescence tomography (CLT) has attracted much attention because of the wide clinically-used probes and three-dimensional (3D) quantification ability. However, due to the serious morbidity of 3D optical imaging, the reconstructed images of CLT are not appreciable, especially when single-view measurements are used. Single-view CLT improves the efficiency of data acquisition. It is much consistent with the actual imaging environment of using commercial imaging system, but bringing the problem that the reconstructed results will be closer to the animal surface on the side where the single-view image is collected. To avoid this problem to the greatest extent possible, we proposed a prior compensation algorithm for CLT reconstruction based on depth calibration strategy. This method takes full account of the fact that the attenuation of light in the tissue will depend heavily on the depth of the light source as well as the distance between the light source and the detection plane. Based on this consideration, a depth calibration matrix was designed to calibrate the attenuation between the surface light flux and the density of the internal light source. The feature of the algorithm was that the depth calibration matrix directly acts on the system matrix of CLT reconstruction, rather than modifying the regularization penalty items. The validity and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm were evaluated with a numerical simulation and a mouse-based experiment, whose results illustrated that it located the radiation sources accurately by using single-view measurements.

Indexed as

cancerCerenkov luminescence tomography (CLT)optical imaging (OI)prior compensationtomographic reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID34631587
PMCPMC8495210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.