Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631572›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Non-Mass Enhancements on DCE-MRI: Development and Validation of a Radiomics-Based Signature for Breast Cancer Diagnoses.

Yan Li, Zhenlu L Yang, Wenzhi Z Lv, Yanjin J Qin, Caili L Tang, Xu Yan, Yihao H Guo, Liming M Xia, Tao Ai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ultrasound diagnosis of non-mass MRI-detected lesions.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan LiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhenlu L YangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wenzhi Z LvDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Julei Technology Company, Wuhan, China.
Yanjin J QinDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Caili L TangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xu YanScientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yihao H GuoMagnetic Resonance (MR) Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare, Guangzhou, China.
Liming M XiaDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tao AiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNSiemens (China) · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to assess the additional value of a radiomics-based signature for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement lesions (NMEs) on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (breast DCE-MRI).

methodsIn this retrospective study, 232 patients with 247 histopathologically confirmed NMEs (malignant: 191; benign: 56) were enrolled from December 2017 to October 2020 as a primary cohort to develop the discriminative models. Radiomic features were extracted from one post-contrast phase (around 90s after contrast injection) of breast DCE-MRI images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was adapted to select features and construct the radiomics-based signature. Based on clinical and routine MR features, radiomics features, and combined information, three discriminative models were built using multivariable logistic regression analyses. In addition, an independent cohort of 72 patients with 72 NMEs (malignant: 50; benign: 22) was collected from November 2020 to April 2021 for the validation of the three discriminative models. Finally, the combined model was assessed using nomogram and decision curve analyses.

resultsThe routine MR model with two selected features of the time-intensity curve (TIC) type and MR-reported axillary lymph node (ALN) status showed a high sensitivity of 0.942 (95%CI, 0.906 - 0.974) and low specificity of 0.589 (95%CI, 0.464 - 0.714). The radiomics model with six selected features was significantly correlated with malignancy (P<0.001 for both primary and validation cohorts). Finally, the individual combined model, which contained factors including TIC types and radiomics signatures, showed good discrimination, with an acceptable sensitivity of 0.869 (95%CI, 0.816 to 0.916), improved specificity of 0.839 (95%CI, 0.750 to 0.929). The nomogram was applied to the validation cohort, reaching good discrimination, with a sensitivity of 0.820 (95%CI, 0.700 to 0.920), specificity of 0.864 (95%CI,0.682 to 1.000). The combined model was clinically helpful, as demonstrated by decision curve analysis.

conclusionsOur study added radiomics signatures into a conventional clinical model and developed a radiomics nomogram including radiomics signatures and TIC types. This radiomics model could be used to differentiate benign from malignant NMEs in patients with suspicious lesions on breast MRI.

Indexed as

breast cancerdifferential diagnosismagnetic resonance imagingnon-mass enhancementradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34631572
PMCPMC8493069
OpenAlexW3200461911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.