Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Impact of Adjuvant Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Di Li, Chaoqiang Deng, Qiang Zheng, Fangqiu Fu, Shengping Wang, Yuan Li, Haiquan Chen, Yang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Di LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Chaoqiang DengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qiang ZhengInstitute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fangqiu FuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shengping WangInstitute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan LiInstitute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haiquan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on efficacy of adjuvant therapy for surgically resected small cell lung cancer are scant. This study was determined to reveal the survival benefits of different adjuvant treatment modalities for limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients following surgical resection.

methodsData of patients with histologically confirmed small cell lung cancer after surgical resection were collected from November 2006 to June 2019. Survival analyses were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method, with log-rank test to evaluate statistical significance. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis using cox proportional hazards model. Further survival analysis and cox regression analysis stratified by clinicopathologic features were conducted to evaluate the survival benefits of different adjuvant treatment modalities.

resultsIn total, 153 out of 157 patients were analyzed. Multivariate analysis showed male sex, lymph node metastasis, residual tumor, VPI and non-adjuvant therapy were independently associated with poor prognosis. Subgroup analyses revealed both adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were significantly associated with superior survival for stage pT2-4 (HR=0.176, 95%CI:0.053-0.578, p=0.004; and HR=0.115, 95%CI:0.033-0.405, p=0.001) and pure SCLC patients (HR=0.182, 95%CI:0.067-0.494, p=0.001; and HR=0.181, 95%CI:0.071-0.465, p<0.001). For pN0 patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better survival (HR=0.219, 95%CI:0.054-0.891, p=0.034), while adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with improved survival for pN+ patients (HR=0.324, 95%CI:0.138-0.760, p=0.010).

conclusionsFor patients without pathologic lymph node metastasis, there is a survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy. However, for patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy might achieve a significant survival benefit. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the results.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT)adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT)overall survival (OS)prognosissmall cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Identifiers

PMID34631534
PMCPMC8495161
OpenAlexW3203251851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.