ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Response to Chemotherapy in Treatment-Naive Epstein-Barr Virus Associated Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demographic/clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of resectable Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: a nested case-control study from an Eastern China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Asian Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2023Review
- EBV-associated diseases: Current therapeutics and emerging technologies.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a special subtype of gastric cancer. However, the perioperative treatment plan and the response to chemotherapy are still uncertain.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients diagnosed with EBVaGC from March 2013 to July 2020 in Beijing Cancer Hospital. Clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. Disease-free survival (DFS) were then calculated, and variants affecting DFS were tested in a Cox proportional regression model.
resultsOne hundred sixty consecutive patients were finally included in our study. Of the patients, 96.9% had adenocarcinoma, while five had squamous cell carcinoma component. Most (70.9%) of them were poorly differentiated. Prevalent programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (69%) and minor HER-2 (3.8%) expression were noticed; all of the patients were MMR proficient (pMMR) or microsatellite stable (MSS). Among 33 patients who experienced neoadjuvant therapy, the number of tumor regression grade (TRG) 1, TRG 2, and TRG 3 was 5, 16, and 12, respectively. Patients with advanced tumor stage and T stage showed poorer response. Thirty-one patients experienced first-line chemotherapy; ORR was 33.3%, and DCR was 61.9%. One hundred forty-seven patients underwent surgery, and 27 of them showed disease recurrence; the 3-year DFS rate was 71.0%. Tumor stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, vascular invasion, and negative PD-L1 expression were associated with poorer DFS. Vascular invasion was the independent risk factor of DFS. Only seven patients reached OS with median follow-up time of 14 months.
conclusionEBVaGC exhibits unique clinicopathological characteristics. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may not be suitable for EBVaGC, and EBVaGC exhibited relatively poor response to chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.