Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631433›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2021

Pilot study of a well-being app to support New Zealand young people during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Anna Serlachius, Anna Boggiss, David Lim, Kiralee Schache, Kate Wallace-Boyd, Jennifer Brenton-Peters, Elise Buttenshaw, Stephanie Chadd, Alana Cavadino, Nicholas Cao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Promotion of Parenting and Mental Health Needs among Chinese Women Living in Japan: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna SerlachiusDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Anna BoggissDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
David LimDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Kiralee SchacheDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Kate Wallace-BoydDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Jennifer Brenton-PetersDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Elise ButtenshawDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Stephanie ChaddDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Alana CavadinoEpidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicholas CaoTamaki Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Eva MorungaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Hiran ThabrewDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWell-being apps represent a promising and scalable approach for improving mental health outcomes in youth, especially during a global pandemic when access to face-to-face interventions may be limited.

objectiveDuring this pilot, we explored the acceptability, usability, and preliminary efficacy of

methodsWe recruited 20 New Zealand young people aged 16-25 years via social media to trial the first prototype of the

resultsStatistically significant improvements in anxiety (p = 0.024) and stress (p = 0.017) were observed from baseline to 2-weeks post intervention. Improvements in well-being (p = 0.021), depression (p = 0.031), anxiety (p = 0.005), and stress (p = 0.004) were also observed from baseline to 6-weeks. No statistically significant changes were seen in self-compassion, optimism, or sleep quality. Effect sizes (partial η

conclusionsOur preliminary results suggest that

Indexed as

AdolescentCoping skillsCOVID-19Mental healthmHealthMobile appsPandemicWell-beingYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID34631433
PMCPMC8486611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.