Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631384›Full record

ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2021

You Have the Big Idea, Concept, and Some Examples ... Now What?

Janet S Twyman, Adam Hockman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using must-have and can-have features to improve conceptual learning.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  2. Features of Direct Instruction: Content Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2021
    Review
  3. Faultless Communication: The Heart and Soul of DI.Perspectives on behavior science · 2021
    Article
  4. The Evidence is in the Design.Perspectives on behavior science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janet S Twymanblast, Cottonwood, AZ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5001-9012
Adam HockmanABA Technologies, Inc, Melbourne, FL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting a concept or content analysis is essential in planning efficient effective instruction. Sequencing instruction when teaching a concept is equally essential. Through instructional sequencing, the upfront analysis of identifying critical and variable attributes comes to life and makes for a successful teaching arrangement. Learning concepts can be made easier or more difficult based on the order in which instructional stimuli are introduced and described. In this article we will describe Direct Instruction's emphasis on clear instruction (faultless communication) and its method for sequencing and arranging positive and negative examples (juxtaposition). We will demonstrate how Direct Instruction's five principles of juxtaposition inform examples should be presented to maximize student learning.

Indexed as

Concept teachingDirect InstructionInstructional designJuxtapositionSequencing

Identifiers

PMID34631384
PMCPMC8458552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.