Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34631150›Full record

ReviewGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2021

A Review of Quantitative Instruments for Understanding Breastfeeding Dynamics.

Matin Torabinia, Steven D Rosenblatt, Bobak Mosadegh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Application of Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning to Identify Infants' Abnormal Suckling Behavior.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matin TorabiniaDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY 10021 USA.
Steven D RosenblattDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY 10021 USA.
Bobak MosadeghDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY 10021 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0607-2825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding, as a unique behavior of the postpartum period and an ideal source of nourishment, is profoundly impacted by the physiology and behavior of both mothers and infants. For more than three-quarters of a century, there has been an ongoing advancement of instruments that permit insight into the complex process of latching during breastfeeding, which includes coordinating sucking, swallowing, and breathing. Despite the available methodologies for understanding latching dynamics, there continues to be a large void in the understanding of infant latching and feeding. The causes for many breastfeeding difficulties remain unclear, and until a clearer understanding of the mechanics involved is achieved, the struggle will continue in the attempts to aid infants and mothers who struggle to breastfeed. In this review, the history of development for the most prominent tools employed to analyze breastfeeding dynamics is presented. Additionally, the importance of the most advanced instruments and systems used to understand latching dynamics is highlighted and how medical practitioners utilize them is reported. Finally, a controversial argument amongst pediatric otolaryngolo gists concerning breastfeeding difficulties is reviewed and the urgent need for quantification of latching dynamics in conjunction with milk removal rate through prospective controlled studies is discussed.

Indexed as

ankyloglossiabreastfeeding dynamicsbreastfeeding instrumentsinfant latching and feedingmilk removal

Identifiers

PMID34631150
PMCPMC8495557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.