ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Health Index Monitoring of Sports Injury Rehabilitation Training Based on Wearable Sensors.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Health Index Monitoring of Sports Injury Rehabilitation Training Based on Wearable Sensors.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/872D4F89CE898F478A50A415AC519B
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to design the perception system of the lower limb wearable rehabilitation robot, this study established the kinematics theoretical model of human lower limb and conducted the kinematics analysis of human body. By using the dynamic attitude analysis system, combined with the human body mark points, the position data of human body mark points in the process of standing up, sitting up, walking, stepping up, and squatting were collected. Combined with the movement mechanism of human lower limbs, the characteristics of human motion state transition are analyzed, and the perceptual algorithm for judging human motion intention is studied, so as to determine the wearer's current posture, standing intention while sitting, walking intention while standing, moving intention, and stopping intention during walking. The results show that the angle of the hip joint changes regularly between 0° and 37° and the angle of the knee joint changes regularly between 0° and 70°during the standing process, which is consistent with the angle change trajectory collected by the dynamic attitude analysis system. The angle trajectories of the hip and knee joints measured by the absolute angle sensor are the same as those obtained by the dynamic attitude analysis system. 1.5 rad and 0.3 rad were selected as reasonable and effective thresholds for determining sitting and standing states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.