ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2021
Endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: From benign to malignant polyps.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A structured conversion score to guide oncologic colectomy during combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery for complex colonic polyps.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Direct access robotic excision (DARE): a novel colonoscopy-assisted approach for full-thickness resection of complex colonic polyps.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Mixed lesions in premalignant colorectal polyps.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2026Article
- Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- S-EMR: A first experience with stalked endoscopic mucosal resection in thick and high-risk pedunculated polyps.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- The Molecular Landscape of Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors: From Endoscopic Subtypes to Molecular Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Non-academic Western Center.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Adenoma per polypectomy as a training metric in colonoscopy: a retrospective analysis of trainee progression compared to expert performance.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Observational
- MRI of early rectal cancer; bisacodyl micro-enema increases submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Multiclassification of Colorectal Polyps from Colonoscopy Images Using AI for Early Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the diagnostic potential of plasma circ-CCDC66 in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a novel forward-looking optical coherence tomography probe for endoscopic applications: an ex vivo feasibility study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Gastrointestinal Disorder Management: Cutting-Edge Advances and Future Prospects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Rectus abdominis muscle abscess after performing colonoscopy-A case report.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer related death in the world. The early detection and removal of CRC precursor lesions has been shown to reduce the incidence of CRC and cancer-related mortality. Endoscopic resection has become the first-line treatment for the removal of most precursor benign colorectal lesions and selected malignant polyps. Detailed lesion assessment is the first critical step in the evaluation and management of colorectal polyps. Polyp size, location and both macro- and micro- features provide important information regarding histological grade and endoscopic resectability. Benign polyps and even malignant polyps with superficial submucosal invasion and favorable histological features can be adequately removed endoscopically. When compared to surgery, endoscopic resection is associated with lower morbidity, mortality, and higher patient quality of life. Conversely, malignant polyps with deep submucosal invasion and/or high risk for lymph node metastasis will require surgery. From a practical standpoint, the most appropriate strategy for each patient will need to be individualized, based not only on polyp- and patient-related characteristics, but also on local resources and expertise availability. In this review, we provide a broad overview and present a potential decision tree algorithm for the evaluation and management of colorectal polyps that can be widely adopted into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.