Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630861›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2021

Current evidence on potential of adipose derived stem cells to enhance bone regeneration and future projection.

Quang Le, Vedavathi Madhu, Joseph M Hart, Charles R Farber, Eli R Zunder, Abhijit S Dighe, Quanjun Cui

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of stem cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from HDrug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. From mesenchymal niches to engineeredMaterials today. Bio · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quang LeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Vedavathi MadhuOrthopaedic Surgery Research, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
Joseph M HartDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Charles R FarberCenter for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Eli R ZunderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Abhijit S DigheDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Quanjun CuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States. qc4q@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries to the postnatal skeleton are naturally repaired through successive steps involving specific cell types in a process collectively termed "bone regeneration". Although complex, bone regeneration occurs through a series of well-orchestrated stages wherein endogenous bone stem cells play a central role. In most situations, bone regeneration is successful; however, there are instances when it fails and creates non-healing injuries or fracture nonunion requiring surgical or therapeutic interventions. Transplantation of adult or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) defined by the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT) as CD105+CD90+CD73+CD45-CD34-CD14orCD11b-CD79αorCD19-HLA-DR- is being investigated as an attractive therapy for bone regeneration throughout the world. MSCs isolated from adipose tissue, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), are gaining increasing attention since this is the most abundant source of adult stem cells and the isolation process for ADSCs is straightforward. Currently, there is not a single Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ADSCs product for bone regeneration. Although the safety of ADSCs is established from their usage in numerous clinical trials, the bone-forming potential of ADSCs and MSCs, in general, is highly controversial. Growing evidence suggests that the ISCT defined phenotype may not represent bona fide osteoprogenitors. Transplantation of both ADSCs and the CD105

Indexed as

Adipose-derived stem cellsBone regenerationEndogenous stem cellsMesenchymal stem cellsSkeletal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID34630861
PMCPMC8474721
OpenAlexW3201603209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.