Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630689›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021

Comprehensive review on the pathophysiology, clinical variants and management of pemphigus (Review).

Victor-Vlad Costan, Cristina Popa, Mădălina Florina Hâncu, Elena Porumb-Andrese, Mihaela Paula Toader

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Oral Manifestations of Autoimmune Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A Global View of Pemphigus: Geographical Variations.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor-Vlad CostanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Cristina PopaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Oral Dermatology, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Mădălina Florina HâncuDepartment of Dermatology, 'Sf. Spiridon' Clinical Emergency County Hospital, 700111 Iași, Romania.
Elena Porumb-AndreseDepartment of Dermatology, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Mihaela Paula ToaderDepartment of Oral Medicine and Oral Dermatology, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROSpitalul Clinic Judeţean de Urgenţe "Sf. Spiridon" Iaşi · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pemphigus represents a group of chronic inflammatory disorders characterized by autoantibodies that target components of desmosomes, leading to the loss of intercellular adhesion between keratinocytes and causing intraepithelial blistering. The pemphigus group consists of four main clinical types with several variants: pemphigus vulgaris (with pemphigus vegetans and pemphigus herpetiformis as variants), pemphigus foliaceus, paraneoplastic pemphigus and IgA pemphigus (with two clinical variants: intraepidermal neutrophilic IgA dermatosis and subcorneal pustular dermatosis). Genetic factors are involved in the pathogenesis, with HLA-DR4 (DRB1*0402) and HLA-DRw6 (DQB1*0503) allele more common in patients with pemphigus vulgaris, HLA class II DRB1*0344 and HLA Cw*1445 correlated with paraneoplastic pemphigus, and HLA-DRB1*04:01, HLA-DRB1*04:06, HLA-DRB1*01:01, HLA-DRB1*14, associated with a higher risk of developing pemphigus foliaceus. Autoantibodies are conducted against structural desmosomal proteins in the skin and mucous membranes, mainly desmogleins, desmocollins and plakins. Cell-mediated immunity may also play a role, especially in paraneoplastic pemphigus. Patients may present erythema, blisters, erosions, and ulcers that may affect the skin, as well as mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity, eyes, nose, leading to severe complaints including pain, dysphagia, and fetor. Oral mucosal postbullous erosive lesions are frequently the first sign of disease in pemphigus vulgaris and in paraneoplastic pemphigus, without skin involvement, making the diagnosis difficult. Treatment options classically include immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids and corticosteroid-sparing agents such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate or dapsone. Newer therapies focus on blocking cell signaling events induced by pathogenic autoantibodies and/or targeting specific autoantibodies. The disease evolution is conditioned by the treatment with maximum doses of corticosteroids and the side effects associated with long-term immunosuppressive therapy, which is why patients need a multidisciplinary approach in following the treatment. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical aspect, diagnosis and management of the main intraepidermal blistering diseases from the pemphigus group.

Indexed as

IgA pemphigusparaneoplastic pemphiguspemphigus foliaceuspemphigus herpetiformispemphigus vegetanspemphigus vulgaris

Identifiers

PMID34630689
PMCPMC8495539
OpenAlexW3200578190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.