Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630573›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2021

Pharmacological Approaches and Regeneration of Bone Defects with Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

M Adamička, A Adamičková, L Danišovič, A Gažová, J Kyselovič

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AdamičkaFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Institute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7158-5876
A AdamičkováFaculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia.
L DanišovičFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Institute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5074-9621
A GažováFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-5693
J KyselovičFaculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-5352
Comenius University Bratislava · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects in the craniomaxillofacial skeleton vary from small periodontal defects to extensive bone loss, which are difficult to restore and can lead to extensive damage of the surrounding structures, deformities, and limited functions. Plenty of surgical regenerative procedures have been developed to reconstruct or prevent alveolar defects, based on guided bone regeneration involving the use of autogenous bone grafts or bone substituents. However, these techniques have limitations in the restoration of morphological and functional reconstruction, thus stopping disease progression but not regenerating lost tissue. Most promising candidates for regenerative therapy of maxillofacial bone defects represent postnatal stem cells, because of their replication potential in the undifferentiated state and their ability to differentiate as well. There is an increased need for using various orofacial sources of stem cells with comparable properties to mesenchymal stem cells because they are more easily available with minimally invasive procedures. In addition to the source of MSCs, another aspect affects the regeneration outcomes. Thermal, mechanical, and chemical stimuli after surgical procedures have the ability to generate pain, usually managed with pharmacological agents, mostly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Some studies revealed that NSAIDs have no significant cytotoxic effect on bone marrow stem cells from mice, while other studies showed regulation of osteogenic and chondrogenic marker genes in MSC cells by NSAIDs and paracetamol, but no effect was observed in connection with diclofenac use. Therefore, there is a need to focus on such pharmacotherapy, capable of affecting the characteristics and properties of implanted MSCs.

Identifiers

PMID34630573
PMCPMC8494572
OpenAlexW3201688100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.