Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630531›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2021

What Are the Barriers and Enablers to the Implementation of Pharmacogenetic Testing in Mental Health Care Settings?

Adam Jameson, Beth Fylan, Greg C Bristow, Gurdeep S Sagoo, Caroline Dalton, Alastair Cardno, Jaspreet Sohal, Samantha L McLean

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Adam JamesonBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Beth FylanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Greg C BristowSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Gurdeep S SagooAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Caroline DaltonBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Alastair CardnoLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jaspreet SohalBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Samantha L McLeanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
University of Bradford · GBBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In psychiatry, the selection of antipsychotics and antidepressants is generally led by a trial-and-error approach. The prescribing of these medications is complicated by sub-optimal efficacy and high rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). These both contribute to poor levels of adherence. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) considers how genetic variation can influence an individual's response to a drug. Pharmacogenetic testing is a tool that could aid clinicians when selecting psychotropic medications, as part of a more personalized approach to prescribing. This may improve the use of and adherence to these medications. Yet to date, the implementation of PGx in mental health environments in the United Kingdom has been slow. This review aims to identify the current barriers and enablers to the implementation of PGx in psychiatry and determine how this can be applied to the uptake of PGx by NHS mental health providers. A systematic searching strategy was developed, and searches were carried out on the PsychInfo, EmBase, and PubMed databases, yielding 11 appropriate papers. Common barriers to the implementation of PGx included cost, concerns over incorporation into current workflow and a lack of knowledge about PGx; whilst frequent enablers included optimism that PGx could lead to precision medicine, reduce ADRs and become a more routine part of psychiatric clinical care. The uptake of PGx in psychiatric care settings in the NHS should consider and overcome these barriers, while looking to capitalize on the enablers identified in this review.

Indexed as

mental healthpharmacogeneticspharmacogenetic testingpharmacogenomicspsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID34630531
PMCPMC8493030
OpenAlexW3199715121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.