Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630465›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Floral Scents of a Deceptive Plant Are Hyperdiverse and Under Population-Specific Phenotypic Selection.

Eva Gfrerer, Danae Laina, Marc Gibernau, Roman Fuchs, Martin Happ, Till Tolasch, Wolfgang Trutschnig, Anja C Hörger, Hans Peter Comes, Stefan Dötterl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Floral Scents of DeceptiveEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Floral Scent Evolution in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva GfrererDepartment of Biosciences, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Danae LainaDepartment of Biosciences, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Marc GibernauLaboratory of Sciences for the Environment, CNRS - University of Corsica, Ajaccio, France.
Roman FuchsDepartment of Biosciences, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Martin HappLab for Intelligent Data Analytics Salzburg, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Till TolaschFG Tierökologie, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Wolfgang TrutschnigDepartment of Mathematics, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Anja C HörgerDepartment of Biosciences, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Hans Peter ComesDepartment of Biosciences, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Biosciences, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floral scent is a key mediator in plant-pollinator interactions. However, little is known to what extent intraspecific scent variation is shaped by phenotypic selection, with no information yet in deceptive plants. In this study, we collected inflorescence scent and fruit set of the deceptive moth fly-pollinated

Indexed as

Arum maculatumbrood-site deceptionchemical ecologygeographic variationhyperdiverse floral scentsphenotypic selectionPsychodidae

Identifiers

PMID34630465
PMCPMC8500232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.