ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021
Loss of Function of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant Genetic Engineering: Technological Pathways, Application Scenarios, and Future Directions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Innovative opportunities for gene editing technology in crop breeding: from the perspective of literature analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Worldwide study on field trials of biotechnological crops: new promises but old policy hurdles.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Unlocking Nature's Clock: CRISPR Technology in Flowering Time Engineering.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparative transcriptome profiling reveals the multiple levels of crosstalk in phytohormone networks in Brassica napus.Plant biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Detection of QTLs for Plant Height Architecture Traits in Rice (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted mutagenesis is now becoming the most favored methodology to improve traits in popular rice cultivars selectively. Understanding the genetic basis of already available mutants could be the first step in designing such experiment. Improved White Ponni (IWP), a popularly grown South Indian rice variety, was subjected to γ irradiation to develop WP-22-2, an M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.