Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630395›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Long Non-Coding RNAs as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Sepsis.

Chuqiao Wang, Guorui Liang, Jieni Shen, Haifan Kong, Donghong Wu, Jinxiang Huang, Xuefeng Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. MicroRNAs in Sepsis.Biomedicines · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Aquaporin Expression and Regulation in Clinical and Experimental Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Research Progress of DcR3 in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chuqiao WangThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guorui LiangNanshan School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jieni ShenNanshan School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Haifan KongNanshan School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Donghong WuNanshan School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinxiang HuangThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuefeng LiThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CNShenzhen Luohu People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis, an infection-induced systemic inflammatory disorder, is often accompanied by multiple organ dysfunction syndromes with high incidence and mortality rates, and those who survive are often left with long-term sequelae, bringing great burden to social economy. Therefore, novel approaches to solve this puzzle are urgently needed. Previous studies revealed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have exerted significant influences on the process of sepsis. The aim of this review is to summarize our understanding of lncRNAs as potential sepsis-related diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets, and provide new insights into the diagnosis and treatment for sepsis. In this study, we also introduced the current diagnostic markers of sepsis and discussed their limitations, while review the research advances in lncRNAs as promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Furthermore, the roles of lncRNAs in sepsis-induced organ dysfunction were illustrated in terms of different organ systems. Nevertheless, further studies should be carried out to elucidate underlying molecular mechanisms and pathological process of sepsis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAnimalsDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityGene Expression RegulationHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyOrgan SpecificityPrognosisRNA, Long NoncodingSepsisBiomarkersRNA, Long Noncodingbiomarkerslong non-coding RNAsorgan injurysepsistherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID34630395
PMCPMC8492911
OpenAlexW3199164571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.