Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Correcting for Superficial Bias in 7T Gradient Echo fMRI.

Pei Huang, Marta M Correia, Catarina Rua, Christopher T Rodgers, Richard N Henson, Johan D Carlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multimodal Neuroimaging in Rett Syndrome WithFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pei HuangSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A∗STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Marta M CorreiaMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Catarina RuaWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christopher T RodgersWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard N HensonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Johan D CarlinMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/14Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrival of submillimeter ultra high-field fMRI makes it possible to compare activation profiles across cortical layers. However, the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal measured by gradient echo (GE) fMRI is biased toward superficial layers of the cortex, which is a serious confound for laminar analysis. Several univariate and multivariate analysis methods have been proposed to correct this bias. We compare these methods using computational simulations of 7T fMRI data from regions of interest (ROI) during a visual attention paradigm. We also tested the methods on a pilot dataset of human 7T fMRI data. The simulations show that two methods-the ratio of ROI means across conditions and a novel application of Deming regression-offer the most robust correction for superficial bias. Deming regression has the additional advantage that it does not require that the conditions differ in their mean activation over voxels within an ROI. When applied to the pilot dataset, we observed strikingly different layer profiles when different attention metrics were used, but were unable to discern any differences in laminar attention across layers when Deming regression or ROI ratio was applied. Our simulations demonstrates that accurate correction of superficial bias is crucial to avoid drawing erroneous conclusions from laminar analyses of GE fMRI data, and this is affirmed by the results from our pilot 7T fMRI data.

Indexed as

7T GE-fMRIcomputational modelingDeming regressionfMRI methodssuperficial bias correction

Identifiers

PMID34630010
PMCPMC8494131
OpenAlexW3199733777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.