Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34630002›Full record

ReviewDer Pneumologe2022

[High-flow oxygen therapy-Chances and risks].

Jörn Grensemann, Marcel Simon, Christian Wachs, Stefan Kluge

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pneumologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jörn GrensemannKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Deutschland.
Marcel SimonAbteilung für Pneumologie, II. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Christian WachsKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Deutschland.
Stefan KlugeKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Deutschland.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-flow oxygen therapy (high flow nasal cannula, HFNC), in which an oxygen-air gas mixture is applied at flow rates between 30 and 70 L/min, is a technically simple and highly effective procedure for the treatment of hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency. Furthermore, HFNC can be used during bronchoscopy for oxygenation, before intubation for preoxygenation, and after extubation to avoid reintubation. The high gas flow prevents the patient from inspiring ambient air, allowing precise adjustment of an inspiratory oxygen fraction; furthermore, a positive end-expiratory pressure is built up by a resulting dynamic pressure, mucociliary clearance is improved by humidification and warming of the air breathed and the work of breathing is reduced by flushing the upper airways. Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, aerosol formation is not increased by HFNC; therefore, this procedure can also be used for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In hypercapnic respiratory failure the data are inconclusive and in this case noninvasive ventilation should currently be preferred instead of HFNC. It is important to remember that patients treated with HFNC are critically ill and therefore require continuous monitoring. It must be ensured that an escalation of therapy, e.g. to intubation and invasive ventilation, can be performed at any time.

Indexed as

HumidifiersOxygen inhalation therapyRespiratory distress syndromeRespiratory insufficiencyRespiratory therapy

Identifiers

PMID34630002
PMCPMC8491602
OpenAlexW3202546093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.